Peer Review Process

Overview

Scientific Insights and Reflections in Multidisciplinary Approaches, Theory, and Application (SIRMATA) employs a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure the highest quality of published research. This process maintains scientific integrity while providing constructive feedback to authors.

Review Process Timeline

1. Initial Submission

Day 1

Manuscript submitted through our online submission system. Authors receive immediate confirmation.

2. Editorial Assessment

Days 1-7

Editor-in-Chief conducts initial assessment for scope, quality, and adherence to submission guidelines.

3. Reviewer Assignment

Days 8-14

Associate Editor assigns 2-3 qualified reviewers with expertise in the manuscript's subject area.

4. Peer Review

Days 15-45

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for originality, methodology, significance, and clarity.

5. Editorial Decision

Days 46-52

Editor makes final decision based on reviewer recommendations and provides detailed feedback.

6. Author Response

As needed

Authors revise manuscript based on feedback and resubmit. Additional review cycles may be required.

Review Criteria

Originality & Novelty
  • Contribution to existing knowledge
  • Innovation in approach or findings
  • Significance to the field
Methodology
  • Appropriateness of research design
  • Validity and reliability of methods
  • Statistical analysis quality
Clarity & Presentation
  • Clear and logical organization
  • Quality of writing and figures
  • Adherence to formatting guidelines
Impact & Significance
  • Potential impact on the field
  • Practical or theoretical implications
  • Interdisciplinary relevance

Editorial Decisions

Accept
Manuscript is accepted for publication with minimal or no revisions required.
Minor Revision
Manuscript requires minor changes before acceptance. Re-review may not be necessary.
Major Revision
Significant changes required. Manuscript will undergo additional peer review.
Reject
Manuscript does not meet publication standards. Detailed feedback provided.
Review Timeline
Initial Review: 4-6 weeks
Revision Review: 2-3 weeks
Final Decision: 1 week
Publication: 2-4 weeks
For Reviewers

We welcome qualified researchers to join our reviewer pool.

Review Ethics
  • Confidentiality maintained
  • Unbiased evaluation
  • Constructive feedback
  • Timely reviews
  • Conflict of interest disclosure